Loading...

Pacific Blue™ anti-mouse Ly-6G Antibody

Pricing & Availability
Clone
1A8 (See other available formats)
Regulatory Status
RUO
Other Names
Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus G
Isotype
Rat IgG2a, κ
Ave. Rating
Submit a Review
Product Citations
publications
1A8_Blue_090309
C57BL/6 bone marrow cells stained with 1A8 Pacific Blue™
  • 1A8_Blue_090309
    C57BL/6 bone marrow cells stained with 1A8 Pacific Blue™
Compare all formats See Pacific Blue™ spectral data
Cat # Size Price Quantity Check Availability Save
127611 25 µg 84€
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
127612 100 µg 199€
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
Description

Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus G (Ly-6G), a 21-25 kD GPI-anchored protein, is expressed on the majority of myeloid cells in bone marrow and peripheral granulocytes.

Product Details
Technical Data Sheet (pdf)

Product Details

Verified Reactivity
Mouse
Antibody Type
Monoclonal
Host Species
Rat
Immunogen
Ly-6G transfected EL-4J cell line.
Formulation
Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide.
Preparation
The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography, and conjugated with Pacific Blue™ under optimal conditions.
Concentration
0.5 mg/ml
Storage & Handling
The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C, and protected from prolonged exposure to light. Do not freeze.
Application

FC - Quality tested
Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤ 1.0 µg per 106 cells in 100 µl volume or 100 µl of whole blood. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

* Pacific Blue™ has a maximum emission of 455 nm when it is excited at 405 nm. Prior to using Pacific Blue™ conjugate for flow cytometric analysis, please verify your flow cytometer's capability of exciting and detecting the fluorochrome.


Alexa Fluor® and Pacific Blue™ are trademarks of Life Technologies Corporation.

View full statement regarding label licenses
Excitation Laser
Violet Laser (405 nm)
Application Notes

While 1A8 recognizes only Ly-6G, clone RB6-8C5 recognizes both Ly-6G and Ly-6C. Clone RB6-8C5 binds with high affinity to mouse Ly-6G molecules and to a lower extent to Ly-6C15. Clone RB6-8C5 impairs the binding of anti-mouse Ly-6G clone 1A815. However, clone RB6-8C5 is able to stain in the presence of anti-mouse Ly-6C clone HK1.416.

Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: immunohistochemistry9 of frozen sections10 and paraffin-embedded sections11, depletion4, 12-14, and spatial biology (IBEX)20,21. The Ultra-LEAF™ purified antibody (Endotoxin < 0.01 EU/µg, Azide-Free, 0.2 µm filtered) is recommended for in vivo studies or highly sensitive assays (Cat. No. 127632, 127649, 127650, 127661 and 127662).

Application References
  1. Fleming TJ, et al. 1993. J. Immunol. 151:2399. (FC)
  2. Daley JM, et al. 2008. J. Leukocyte Biol. 83:1. (FC)
  3. Dietlin TA, et al. 2007. J. Leukocyte Biol. 81:1205. (FC)
  4. Daley J, et al. 2007. J. Leukocyte Biol. doi:10.1189. (Deplete) PubMed
  5. Tadagavadi RK, et al. 2010. J. Immunol. 185:4904. PubMed
  6. Sumagin R, et al. 2010. J. Immunol. 185:7057. PubMed
  7. Guiducci C, et al. 2010. J. Exp Med. 207:2931. PubMed
  8. Fujita M, et al. 2011. Cancer Res. 71:2664. PubMed
  9. Van Leeuwen, et al. 2008. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28:84. (IHC)
  10. Kowanetz M, et al. 2010. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:21248. [supplementary data] (IHC)
  11. Esbona K, et al. 2016. Breast Cancer Res. 18:35. (IHC)
  12. Wojtasiak M, et al. 2010. J. Gen. Virol. 91:2158. (FC, Deplete)
  13. Jaeger BN, et al. 2012. J. Exp. Med. 209:565. (Deplete)
  14. Wozniak KL, et al. 2012. BMC Immunol. 13:65 (FC, Deplete)
  15. Ribechini E, et al. 2009. Eur. J. Immunol. 39:3538.
  16. Ng LG, et al. 2011. J Invest. Dermatol. 131:2058. PubMed
  17. Ma C, et al. 2012. J. Leukoc. Biol. 92:1199.
  18. McCartney-Francis, N, et al. 2014. J Leukoc. Biol. 96:917. PubMed
  19. Her Z, et al. 2014. EMBO Mol. Med. 7:24. PubMed
  20. Radtke AJ, et al. 2020. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:33455-65. (SB) PubMed
  21. Radtke AJ, et al. 2022. Nat Protoc. 17:378-401. (SB) PubMed
Product Citations
  1. Hou X, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 28(1):172-189.e7.. PubMed
  2. Yan J, et al. 2012. J Immunol. 188:2316. PubMed
  3. Huang W, et al. 2015. J Allergy Clin Immunol. . PubMed
  4. Barkaway A, et al. 2021. Immunity. . PubMed
  5. Honda M, et al. 2021. Nat Commun. 12:7294. PubMed
  6. Li F, et al. 2022. Mediators Inflamm. 2022:5782922. PubMed
  7. Cohen K, et al. 2021. Cell Rep. 37:110026. PubMed
  8. Li J, et al. 2022. FASEB J. 36:e22400. PubMed
  9. Dong H, et al. 2022. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 119:e2123247119. PubMed
  10. Kraemer AN, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:933191. PubMed
  11. Peng Y, et al. 2023. Respir Res. 24:33. PubMed
  12. Chen K, et al. 2022. Adv Sci (Weinh). 9:e2104106. PubMed
  13. Wang YC, et al. 2023. J Exp Med. 220:. PubMed
  14. MacPherson KP, et al. 2023. Front Cell Neurosci. 17:895017. PubMed
  15. Tong L, et al. 2023. Sci Adv. 9:eade5041. PubMed
  16. Bodogai M, et al. 2015. Cancer Res . 75: 3456-3465. PubMed
  17. Herz J, et al. 2015. J Exp Med. 212: 1153 - 1169. PubMed
  18. Hooftman A, et al. 2020. Cell Metabolism. 32(3):468-478. PubMed
  19. Jung J, et al. 2019. Cell Host Microbe. 25:513. PubMed
  20. Shavit Stein E, et al. 2018. Neural Plast. 2018:7692182. PubMed
  21. Her Z, et al. 2015. EMBO Mol Med. 7:24. PubMed
  22. Mylonas K, et al. 2015. Immunobiology. 220: 924-933. PubMed
  23. Cardona S, et al. 2015. ASN Neuro. 7: 1759091415608204. PubMed
  24. Weng L, et al. 2016. Sci Rep. 6:38632. PubMed
  25. Yilmaz B, et al. 2021. Cell Host Microbe. 29(4):650-663.e9. PubMed
  26. Yu X, et al. 2021. Nature. 594:560. PubMed
  27. Davis FM, et al. 2019. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 39:2353. PubMed
  28. Shemer A, et al. 2020. Immunity. 53(5):1033-1049.e7. PubMed
  29. Chew W, et al. 2016. Nat Methods. 13: 868-874. PubMed
  30. McCreedy DA et al. 2018. eNeuro. 5(4) pii: ENEURO. PubMed
  31. Gibbons M, et al. 2011. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 184:569. PubMed
  32. Liang Z, et al. 2020. Pain. 161:2089. PubMed
  33. Wang F, et al. 2021. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13:257. PubMed
  34. Varol D et al. 2017. Immunity. 46(6):1030-1044 . PubMed
  35. Linde N, et al. 2018. Nat Commun. 9:21. PubMed
  36. Wessel AW, et al. 2020. Nat Commun. 4.123611111. PubMed
  37. Neupane AS, et al. 2020. Cell. 183(1):110-125.e11. PubMed
  38. Sutherland TE, et al. 2021. Frontiers in Immunology. 12:715209. PubMed
  39. Mishra BB, et al. 2017. Nat Microbiol. 2:17072. PubMed
  40. Gittens B, et al. 2017. J Immunol. 10.4049/jimmunol.1600709. PubMed
  41. Dorward D, et al. 2013. J Leukoc Biol. 94:193. PubMed
  42. Sharma A, et al. 2020. Cell. 183(2):377-394.e21. PubMed
  43. Arnardottir H, et al. 2021. J Clin Invest. Online ahead of print. PubMed
  44. Colombo M, et al. 2022. iScience. 25:105042. PubMed
  45. Dong L, et al. 2022. Cells. 11:. PubMed
  46. Poczobutt JM, et al. 2021. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 64:629. PubMed
  47. Ding P, et al. 2022. Bone Res. 10:42. PubMed
  48. Anderson AE, et al. 2022. NPJ Regen Med. 7:6. PubMed
  49. Zhang L, et al. 2015. J Immunol. 194:5423. PubMed
  50. Yamada KJ, et al. 2020. PLoS Pathog. 16:e1008354. PubMed
  51. Goldstein JM et al. 2019. Cell reports. 27(4):1254-1264 . PubMed
  52. Kim K, et al. 2014. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111:11774. PubMed
  53. Wang B, et al. 2015. Sci Rep. 5: 17695. PubMed
  54. Teo T, et al. 2015. J Virol. 89: 7955-7969. PubMed
  55. Fukushima K, et al. 2020. Immunity. 52(3):542-556. PubMed
  56. Teo TH, et al. 2018. Nat Commun. 9:3905. PubMed
  57. Hickey A, et al. 2013. Infect Immun . 81:2123. PubMed
  58. Calderon B, et al. 2015. J Exp Med. 212: 1497-1512. PubMed
  59. Myers DR, et al. 2020. Front Immunol. 11:576310. PubMed
  60. Kumari P, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 35(3):109012. PubMed
  61. Ding L et al. 2018. Cell reports. 25(11):2972-2980 . PubMed
  62. de Gaetano M, et al. 2021. J Med Chem. 64:9193. PubMed
  63. Chryplewicz A, et al. 2022. Cancer Cell. 40:1111. PubMed
  64. Avila M, et al. 2012. Innate Immunity. 18:648. PubMed
  65. Sadtler K, et al. 2017. Tissue Eng Part A. 23:1044. PubMed
  66. Deniset JF et al. 2019. Immunity. 51(1):131-140 . PubMed
  67. Abe H, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:2824. PubMed
RRID
AB_1877212 (BioLegend Cat. No. 127611)
AB_1877212 (BioLegend Cat. No. 127612)

Antigen Details

Structure
A 21-35 kD GPI-anchorded membrane protein
Distribution

Expressed on the majority of myeloid cells in bone marrow and peripheral granulocytes. The monoclonal antibody RB6-8C5 recognizes both Ly-6G and Ly-6C.

Cell Type
Granulocytes, Macrophages, Monocytes
Biology Area
Immunology, Innate Immunity
Antigen References

Fleming TJ, et al. 1993. J. Immunol. 151:2399.

Gene ID
546644 View all products for this Gene ID
UniProt
View information about Ly-6G on UniProt.org

Related FAQs

There are no FAQs for this product.

Other Formats

View All Ly-6G Reagents Request Custom Conjugation
Description Clone Applications
Alexa Fluor® 594 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 IHC-F,SB
Purified anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC,IHC-F,IHC-P,SB
Biotin anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC,IHC
FITC anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
PE anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Alexa Fluor® 647 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC,IHC-F,SB
Pacific Blue™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
APC anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Alexa Fluor® 700 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC,IHC
APC/Cyanine7 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC,IHC-F,SB
Brilliant Violet 421™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC,IHC-F
Brilliant Violet 570™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Ultra-LEAF™ Purified anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC,Depletion,IHC
Brilliant Violet 510™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Purified anti-mouse Ly-6G (Maxpar® Ready) 1A8 FC,CyTOF®,WB
Brilliant Violet 650™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Brilliant Violet 711™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Brilliant Violet 605™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Brilliant Violet 785™ anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
PE/Dazzle™ 594 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
APC/Fire™ 750 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
PerCP anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
TotalSeq™-A0015 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 PG
TotalSeq™-C0015 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 PG
TotalSeq™-B0015 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 PG
Spark Blue™ 550 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Spark NIR™ 685 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Spark YG™ 593 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
APC/Fire™ 810 anti-mouse Ly-6G Antibody 1A8 FC
PE/Cyanine5 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
PE/Fire™ 810 anti-mouse Ly-6G Antibody 1A8 FC
Spark UV™ 387 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
PE/Fire™ 640 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Spark YG™ 570 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 IHC-F,FC
Spark Red™ 718 anti-mouse Ly-6G (Flexi-Fluor™) 1A8 FC
Spark Blue™ 574 anti-mouse Ly-6G (Flexi-Fluor™) 1A8 FC
PerCP/Fire™ 806 anti-mouse Ly-6G 1A8 FC
Go To Top Version: 3    Revision Date: 01.06.2017

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic or therapeutic use.

 

This product is supplied subject to the terms and conditions, including the limited license, located at www.biolegend.com/terms) ("Terms") and may be used only as provided in the Terms. Without limiting the foregoing, BioLegend products may not be used for any Commercial Purpose as defined in the Terms, resold in any form, used in manufacturing, or reverse engineered, sequenced, or otherwise studied or used to learn its design or composition without express written approval of BioLegend. Regardless of the information given in this document, user is solely responsible for determining any license requirements necessary for user’s intended use and assumes all risk and liability arising from use of the product. BioLegend is not responsible for patent infringement or any other risks or liabilities whatsoever resulting from the use of its products.

 

BioLegend, the BioLegend logo, and all other trademarks are property of BioLegend, Inc. or their respective owners, and all rights are reserved.

 

8999 BioLegend Way, San Diego, CA 92121 www.biolegend.com
Toll-Free Phone: 1-877-Bio-Legend (246-5343) Phone: (858) 768-5800 Fax: (877) 455-9587

This data display is provided for general comparisons between formats.
Your actual data may vary due to variations in samples, target cells, instruments and their settings, staining conditions, and other factors.
If you need assistance with selecting the best format contact our expert technical support team.

ProductsHere
Login / Register
Remember me
Forgot your password? Reset password?
Create an Account