Brilliant Violet 421™ anti-mouse CD279 (PD-1) Antibody

Product Details

Verified Reactivity

Mouse

Antibody Type

Monoclonal

Host Species

Rat

Immunogen

PD-1 cDNA followed by PD-1-Ig fusion protein

Formulation

Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide and BSA (origin USA).

Preparation

The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography and conjugated with Brilliant Violet 421™ under optimal conditions.

Concentration

µg sizes: 0.2 mg/mL
µL sizes: lot-specific (to obtain lot-specific concentration and expiration, please enter the lot number in our Certificate of Analysis online tool.)

Storage & Handling

The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C, and protected from prolonged exposure to light. Do not freeze.

Application

FC - Quality tested

SB - Reported in the literature, not verified in house

Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For immunofluorescent staining using the µg size, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤0.125 µg per million cells in 100 µl volume. For immunofluorescent staining using µl sizes, the suggested use of this reagent is 5 µl per million cells in 100 µl staining volume or 5 µl per 100 µl of whole blood. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

Brilliant Violet 421™ excites at 405 nm and emits at 421 nm. The standard bandpass filter 450/50 nm is recommended for detection. Brilliant Violet 421™ is a trademark of Sirigen Group Ltd.

Learn more about Brilliant Violet™.

This product is subject to proprietary rights of Sirigen Inc. and is made and sold under license from Sirigen Inc. The purchase of this product conveys to the buyer a non-transferable right to use the purchased product for research purposes only. This product may not be resold or incorporated in any manner into another product for resale. Any use for therapeutics or diagnostics is strictly prohibited. This product is covered by U.S. Patent(s), pending patent applications and foreign equivalents.

Excitation Laser

Violet Laser (405 nm)

Application Notes

Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: immunohistochemical staining of acetone-fixed frozen tissue³, in vivo blocking of PD-1 binding to its ligands^2,3, and spatial biology (IBEX)^5,6.

Additional Product Notes

Iterative Bleaching Extended multi-pleXity (IBEX) is a fluorescent imaging technique capable of highly-multiplexed spatial analysis. The method relies on cyclical bleaching of panels of fluorescent antibodies in order to image and analyze many markers over multiple cycles of staining, imaging, and, bleaching. It is a community-developed open-access method developed by the Center for Advanced Tissue Imaging (CAT-I) in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, NIH).

Application References

(PubMed link indicates BioLegend citation)

1. Good-Jacobson KL, et al. 2010. Nat. Immunol. 11:535. (FC) PubMed
2. Lázár-Molnár E, et al. 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:2658. (Block)
3. Liang SC, et al. 2003. Eur. J. Immunol. 33:2706. (FC, IHC, Block)
4. Tobias J, et al. 2020. Front Immunol. 11:895 (FC, ELISA) PubMed
5. Radtke AJ, et al. 2020. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:33455-65. (SB) PubMed
6. Radtke AJ, et al. 2022. Nat Protoc. 17:378-401. (SB) PubMed

Product Citations

1. Swan SL, et al. 2023. Front Immunol. 14:1085547. PubMed
2. Tan X, et al. 2023. Adv Sci (Weinh). 10:e2206768. PubMed
3. del Rio ML, et al. 2023. Front Immunol. 14:1113858. PubMed
4. Palakurthi B, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:2109. PubMed
5. Tai W, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:2962. PubMed
6. Kuczynski EA, et al. 2022. EMBO Mol Med. 14:e15816. PubMed
7. Shallberg LA, et al. 2022. PLoS Pathog. 18:e1010296. PubMed
8. del Rio ML, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:887348. PubMed
9. VanDyke D, et al. 2022. Cell Rep. 41:111478. PubMed
10. Tunali G, et al. 2023. J Clin Invest. :. PubMed
11. Abu Hejleh AP, et al. 2023. Int J Tryptophan Res. 16:11786469231153111. PubMed
12. Allen SD, et al. 2021. Biomaterials. 269:120635. PubMed
13. Yeh CH, et al. 2022. Immunity. 55:272. PubMed
14. Perry JA, et al. 2022. Nat Immunol. 23:743. PubMed
15. Fitzgerald B, et al. 2021. Cell Rep Methods. 1:. PubMed
16. Jiang W, et al. 2021. Oncol Lett. 22:625. PubMed
17. Ogbechi J, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:1001956. PubMed
18. Clemmensen HS, et al. 2021. MBio. 12:. PubMed
19. Delacher M, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(4):702-720.e17. PubMed
20. Kim Y, et al. 2015. PLoS One. 10:120294. PubMed
21. Nagai Y, et al. 2019. Front Immunol. 10:174. PubMed
22. Wei SC, et al. 2019. Immunity. 50:1084. PubMed
23. Silva M, et al. 2021. Sci Immunol. 6:eabf1152. PubMed
24. Wang C, et al. 2021. Cell Rep. 37:110021. PubMed
25. Clemmensen HS, et al. 2020. Front Immunol. 11:585359. PubMed
26. Calvo-Barreiro L, et al. 2021. Neurotherapeutics. . PubMed
27. Pein M, et al. 2020. Nat Commun. 11:1494. PubMed
28. Liu H, et al. 2020. Cancer Cell. 37(3):324-339. PubMed
29. Mehta AK, et al. 2021. Nat Cancer. 2:66. PubMed
30. Wong HS, et al. 2021. Cell. . PubMed
31. Synn CB, et al. 2022. Clin Transl Immunology. 11:e1364. PubMed
32. Tavazoie MF, et al. 2018. Cell. 172:825. PubMed
33. Martínez‐López M et al. 2019. Immunity. 50(2):446-461 . PubMed
34. Puigdelloses M, et al. 2021. J Immunother Cancer. 9:. PubMed
35. Li H, et al. 2021. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2001596:8. PubMed
36. Yan J, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 107820:31. PubMed
37. Watson MJ, et al. 2021. Nature. 591:645. PubMed
38. Zhang X, et al. 2021. Mol Cancer Res. 19:1076. PubMed
39. Ryan NM, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:932742. PubMed
40. RY H, et al. 2016. Oncoimmunology. 6:e1249561. PubMed
41. He C, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:5459. PubMed
42. Yuan M, et al. 2022. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022:5479491. PubMed
43. Bent EH, et al. 2021. Nat Commun. 12:6218. PubMed
44. Kumagai S, et al. 2020. Immunity. 53(1):187-203.e8. PubMed
45. Papa I, et al. 2017. Nature. 547:318. PubMed
46. Mulens-Arias V, et al. 2022. Pharmaceutics. 14:. PubMed
47. Amobi-McCloud A, et al. 2021. Front Immunol. 12:678999. PubMed
48. Nicolas-Boluda A, et al. 2021. eLife. 10:00. PubMed
49. Lau P, et al. 2022. Cell Mol Immunol. :. PubMed
50. Wan X, Thomas J, Unanue E 2016. J Exp Med. 213: 967 - 978. PubMed
51. Szeto C, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:4951. PubMed
52. Kinsey G, et al. 2012. J Am Soc Nephrol. 23:1528. PubMed
53. Lal JC, et al. 2021. Breast Cancer Res. 23:83. PubMed
54. Song X, et al. 2022. Transl Oncol. 15:101306. PubMed
55. Gonzalez-Figueroa P, et al. 2021. Cell. 184(7):1775-1789.e19. PubMed
56. Ye Y, et al. 2020. Genome Med. 0.557638889. PubMed
57. Scala M, et al. 2016. J Virol. 90: 8563 - 8574. PubMed

RRID

AB_2561447 (BioLegend Cat. No. 135217)
AB_2561447 (BioLegend Cat. No. 135221)
AB_2561447 (BioLegend Cat. No. 135218)

Antigen Details

Structure

A 50-55 kD glycoprotein belonging to the CD28 family of the Ig superfamily.

Distribution

Induced on splenic T and B lymphocytes, thymocytes, and myeloid cells after stimulation.

Function

Involved in lymphocyte clonal selection and peripheral tolerance, prolonged survival of allografts.

Ligand/Receptor

B7-H1 (PD-L1) and B7-DC (PD-L2)

Cell Type

B cells, T cells

Biology Area

Cancer Biomarkers, Immunology, Inhibitory Molecules

Molecular Family

CD Molecules, Immune Checkpoint Receptors

Antigen References

1. Nishimura H, et al. 2001. Science 291:319
2. Agata Y, et al. 1996. Int. Immunol. 8:765
3. Liang SC, et al. 2003. Eur. J. Immunol. 33:2706
4. Barber DL, et al. 2006. Nature 439:682
5. Keir ME, et al. 2005. J. Immunol. 175:7372
6. Koehn BH. et al. 2008. J Immunol. 181:5313

Gene ID

18566 View all products for this Gene ID

UniProt

View information about CD279 on UniProt.org

Documentation

• Technical data sheet
• Certificate of Analysis
• Material Safety Data Sheet

Reviews

Related Protocols

• Cell Surface Flow Cytometry Staining Protocol

Related Pages & Pathways

Related FAQs

What is the F/P ratio range of our BV421™ format antibody reagents?

It is lot-specific. On average it ranges between 2-4.

If an antibody clone has been previously successfully used in IBEX in one fluorescent format, will other antibody formats work as well?

It’s likely that other fluorophore conjugates to the same antibody clone will also be compatible with IBEX using the same sample fixation procedure. Ultimately a directly conjugated antibody’s utility in fluorescent imaging and IBEX may be specific to the sample and microscope being used in the experiment. Some antibody clone conjugates may perform better than others due to performance differences in non-specific binding, fluorophore brightness, and other biochemical properties unique to that conjugate.

Will antibodies my lab is already using for fluorescent or chromogenic IHC work in IBEX?

Fundamentally, IBEX as a technique that works much in the same way as single antibody panels or single marker IF/IHC. If you’re already successfully using an antibody clone on a sample of interest, it is likely that clone will have utility in IBEX. It is expected some optimization and testing of different antibody fluorophore conjugates will be required to find a suitable format; however, legacy microscopy techniques like chromogenic IHC on fixed or frozen tissue is an excellent place to start looking for useful antibodies.

Are other fluorophores compatible with IBEX?

Over 18 fluorescent formats have been screened for use in IBEX, however, it is likely that other fluorophores are able to be rapidly bleached in IBEX. If a fluorophore format is already suitable for your imaging platform it can be tested for compatibility in IBEX.

The same antibody works in one tissue type but not another. What is happening?

Differences in tissue properties may impact both the ability of an antibody to bind its target specifically and impact the ability of a specific fluorophore conjugate to overcome the background fluorescent signal in a given tissue. Secondary stains, as well as testing multiple fluorescent conjugates of the same clone, may help to troubleshoot challenging targets or tissues. Using a reference control tissue may also give confidence in the specificity of your staining.

How can I be sure the staining I’m seeing in my tissue is real?

In general, best practices for validating an antibody in traditional chromogenic or fluorescent IHC are applicable to IBEX. Please reference the Nature Methods review on antibody based multiplexed imaging for resources on validating antibodies for IBEX.

Other Formats

Certificate of Analysis