Biotin anti-mouse CD4 Antibody

Pricing & Availability
Clone
RM4-5 (See other available formats)
Regulatory Status
RUO
Other Names
L3T4, T4
Isotype
Rat IgG2a, κ
RM4-5_Biotin_030206
C57BL/6 mouse splenocytes stained with biotinylated CD4 (clone RM4-5) (filled histogram) or biotinylated rat IgG2a, κ isotype control (open histogram).
  • RM4-5_Biotin_030206
    C57BL/6 mouse splenocytes stained with biotinylated CD4 (clone RM4-5) (filled histogram) or biotinylated rat IgG2a, κ isotype control (open histogram).
Compare all formats
Cat # Size Price Quantity Check Availability
100507 50 µg $36.00
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
100508 500 µg $114.00
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
Description

CD4 is a 55 kD protein also known as L3T4 or T4. It is a member of the Ig superfamily, primarily expressed on most thymocytes and a subset of T cells, and weakly on macrophages and dendritic cells. It acts as a co-receptor with the TCR during T cell activation and thymic differentiation by binding MHC class II and associating with the protein tyrosine kinase lck.

Technical data sheet

Product Details

Verified Reactivity
Mouse
Antibody Type
Monoclonal
Host Species
Rat
Immunogen
BALB/c mouse thymocytes
Formulation
Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide.
Preparation
The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography, and conjugated with biotin under optimal conditions.
Concentration
0.5 mg/ml
Storage & Handling
The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C. Do not freeze.
Application

FC - Quality tested
Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤ 0.25 µg per 106 cells in 100 µl volume. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

Application Notes

The RM4-5 antibody blocks the binding of GK1.5 antibody and H129.19 antibody to CD4+ T cells, but not RM4-4 antibody. Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: blocking of ligand binding, in vivo depletion of CD4+ cells1, and immunohistochemistry of acetone-fixed frozen tissue sections2,3,11 and paraffin-embedded sections11. Clone RM4-5 is not recommended for immunohistochemistry of formalin-fixed paraffin sections. Instead, acetone frozen or zinc-fixed paraffin sections are recommended. The Ultra-LEAF™ Purified antibody (Endotoxin < 0.01 EU/µg, Azide-Free, 0.2 µm filtered) is recommended for functional assays (Cat. No. 100575 and 100576).

Application References

(PubMed link indicates BioLegend citation)
  1. Kruisbeek AM. 1991. In Curr. Protocols Immunol. pp. 4.1.1-4.1.5. (Block, Deplete)
  2. Nitta H, et al. 1997. Cell Vision 4:73. (IHC)
  3. Fan WY, et al. 2001. Exp. Biol. Med. 226:1045.
  4. Muraille E, et al. 2003. Infect. Immun. 71:2704. (IHC)
  5. León-Ponte M, et al. 2007. Blood 109:3139. (FC)
  6. Bourdeau A, et al. 2007. Blood doi:10.1182/blood-2006-08-044370. (FC)
  7. Matsumoto M, et al. 2007.J. Immunol.178:2499. PubMed
  8. Shigeta A, et al. 2008. Blood 112:4915. PubMed
  9. Zaborsky N, et al. 2010. J. Immunol. 184:725. PubMed
  10. Rodrigues-Manzanet R, et al. 2010. P. Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8706. PubMed
  11. Whiteland JL, et al. 1995. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 43:313. (IHC)
Product Citations
  1. Marié IJ, et al. 2022. Bio Protoc. 12:e4438. PubMed
  2. Giannou AD, et al. 2023. Immunity. 56:125. PubMed
  3. Bouchareychas L, et al. 2021. iScience. 24(8):102847. PubMed
  4. Zhu C, et al. 2018. Sci Rep. 5.113194444. PubMed
  5. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez Ó, et al. 2021. EMBO Rep. 22:e52905. PubMed
  6. Preglej T, et al. 2020. JCI Insight. 5(4):. PubMed
  7. Yu VWC et al. 2016. Cell. 167(5):1310-1322 . PubMed
  8. Yang X, et al. 2020. Blood Sci. 2:89. PubMed
  9. Delacher M, et al. 2021. Immunity. 54(4):702-720.e17. PubMed
  10. Xu X, et al. 2020. J Cell Biol. 219:00:00. PubMed
  11. Kitano M, et al. 2016. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113: 1044 - 1049. PubMed
  12. Wang L, et al. 2021. Cancer Immunol Res. 9:348. PubMed
  13. Yu VWC, et al. 2017. Cell. 168:944. PubMed
  14. Miska J et al. 2019. Cell reports. 27(1):226-237 . PubMed
  15. Dietmar Herndler‐Brandstetter et al. 2018. Immunity. 48(4):716-729 . PubMed
  16. Rao X, et al. 2022. Respir Res. 23:286. PubMed
  17. Chauveau A, et al. 2020. Immunity. 52:794. PubMed
  18. Wang F, et al. 2021. Cell. 184(2):422-440.e17. PubMed
  19. Trefzer A, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(6):108748. PubMed
  20. Li Z, et al. 2021. MBio. 12:e0254221. PubMed
  21. Yi W, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(13):108922. PubMed
  22. Cheng Q, et al. 2014. J Immunol. 192:3686. PubMed
  23. Saunders S, et al. 2010. J Immunol. 184:2627. PubMed
  24. Chen Z, et al. 2019. J Exp Med. 216:152. PubMed
  25. Stofkova A, et al. 2021. Int J Mol Sci. 23:. PubMed
  26. Lehrke MJ, et al. 2021. Elife. 10:. PubMed
  27. Rohrbeck L, et al. 2020. Immunol Cell Biol. . PubMed
  28. Zhang C, et al. 2018. Cell Res. 28:323. PubMed
  29. Sturmlechner I, et al. 2021. Science. 374:eabb3420. PubMed
  30. Arima Y et al. 2017. eLife. 6 pii: e25517. PubMed
RRID
AB_312710 (BioLegend Cat. No. 100507)
AB_312710 (BioLegend Cat. No. 100508)

Antigen Details

Structure
Ig superfamily, 55 kD
Distribution

Majority of thymocytes, T cell subset

Function
TCR co-receptor, T cell activation
Ligand/Receptor
MHC class II molecule
Cell Type
Dendritic cells, T cells, Thymocytes, Tregs
Biology Area
Immunology
Molecular Family
CD Molecules
Antigen References

1. Barclay A, et al. 1997. The Leukocyte Antigen FactsBook Academic Press.
2. Bierer BE, et al. 1989. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7:579.
3. Janeway CA. 1992. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10:645.

Gene ID
12504 View all products for this Gene ID
UniProt
View information about CD4 on UniProt.org
Go To Top Version: 3    Revision Date: 01/29/2013

8999 BioLegend Way, San Diego, CA 92121 www.biolegend.com
Toll-Free Phone: 1-877-Bio-Legend (246-5343) Phone: (858) 768-5800 Fax: (877) 455-9587

This data display is provided for general comparisons between formats.
Your actual data may vary due to variations in samples, target cells, instruments and their settings, staining conditions, and other factors.
If you need assistance with selecting the best format contact our expert technical support team.

Login/Register
Forgot your password? Reset Password
Request an Account