Brilliant Violet 605™ anti-human CD3 Antibody

Pricing & Availability
Clone
OKT3 (See other available formats)
Regulatory Status
RUO
Workshop
HCDM listed
Other Names
T3, CD3ε
Isotype
Mouse IgG2a, κ
OKT3_BV605_013112
Human peripheral lymphocytes were stained with CD3 (clone OKT3) Brilliant Violet 605™ (filled histogram).
  • OKT3_BV605_013112
    Human peripheral lymphocytes were stained with CD3 (clone OKT3) Brilliant Violet 605™ (filled histogram).
Compare all formats See Brilliant Violet 605™ spectral data
Cat # Size Price Quantity Check Availability
317321 25 tests $215.00
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
317322 100 tests $424.00
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
Description

CD3ε is a 20 kD chain of the CD3/T cell receptor (TCR) complex, which is composed of two CD3ε, one CD3γ, one CD3δ, one CD3ζ (CD247), and a T cell receptor (α/β or γ/δ) heterodimer. It is found on all mature T lymphocytes, NK T cells, and some thymocytes. CD3, also known as T3, is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that plays a role in antigen recognition, signal transduction, and T cell activation.

Technical data sheet

Product Details

Verified Reactivity
Human
Antibody Type
Monoclonal
Host Species
Mouse
Formulation
Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide and BSA (origin USA).
Preparation
The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography and conjugated with Brilliant Violet 605™ under optimal conditions.
Concentration
Lot-specific (to obtain lot-specific concentration and expiration, please enter the lot number in our Certificate of Analysis online tool.)
Storage & Handling
The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C, and protected from prolonged exposure to light. Do not freeze.
Application

FC - Quality tested

Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is 5 µl per million cells in 100 µl staining volume or 5 µl per 100 µl of whole blood.

Brilliant Violet 605™ excites at 405 nm and emits at 603 nm. The bandpass filter 610/20 nm is recommended for detection, although filter optimization may be required depending on other fluorophores used. Be sure to verify that your cytometer configuration and software setup are appropriate for detecting this channel. Refer to your instrument manual or manufacturer for support. Brilliant Violet 605™ is a trademark of Sirigen Group Ltd.


Learn more about Brilliant Violet™.

This product is subject to proprietary rights of Sirigen Inc. and is made and sold under license from Sirigen Inc. The purchase of this product conveys to the buyer a non-transferable right to use the purchased product for research purposes only. This product may not be resold or incorporated in any manner into another product for resale. Any use for therapeutics or diagnostics is strictly prohibited. This product is covered by U.S. Patent(s), pending patent applications and foreign equivalents.
Excitation Laser
Violet Laser (405 nm)
Application Notes

The OKT3 monoclonal antibody reacts with an epitope on the epsilon-subunit within the human CD3 complex.

Clone OKT3 can block the binding of clones SK7 and UCHT1.4 The OKT3 antibody is able to induce T cell activation. Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: immunohistochemical staining of acetone-fixed frozen sections and activation of T cells. The LEAF™ purified antibody (Endotoxin <0.1 EU/µg, Azide-Free, 0.2 µm filtered) is recommended for functional assays (Cat. No. 317304). For highly sensitive assays, we recommend Ultra-LEAF™ purified antibody (Cat. No. 317326) with a lower endotoxin limit than standard LEAF™ purified antibodies (Endotoxin <0.01 EU/µg).

Application References

(PubMed link indicates BioLegend citation)
  1. Schlossman S, et al. Eds. 1995. Leucocyte Typing V. Oxford University Press. New York.
  2. Knapp W. 1989. Leucocyte Typing IV. Oxford University Press New York.
  3. Barclay N, et al. 1997. The Leucocyte Antigen Facts Book. Academic Press Inc. San Diego.
  4. Li B, et al. 2005. Immunology 116:487.
  5. Jeong HY, et al. 2008. J. Leuckocyte Biol. 83:755. PubMed
  6. Alter G, et al. 2008. J. Virol. 82:9668. PubMed
  7. Manevich-Mendelson E, et al. 2009. Blood 114:2344. PubMed
  8. Pinto JP, et al. 2010. Immunology. 130:217. PubMed
  9. Biggs MJ, et al. 2011. J. R. Soc. Interface. 8:1462. PubMed
Product Citations
  1. Carre C, et al. 2021. iScience. 24:102970. PubMed
  2. Pal R, et al. 2020. Curr Protoc Cytom. 92:e69. PubMed
  3. Ghassemi S, et al. 2022. Nat Biomed Eng. 6:118. PubMed
  4. VanDyke D, et al. 2022. Cell Rep. 41:111478. PubMed
  5. Lim JME 2023. STAR Protocols. 4(1):101995. PubMed
  6. Babl N, et al. 2023. Front Oncol. 13:1107484. PubMed
  7. Stegmann K, et al. 2016. Sci Rep. 6: 26157. PubMed
  8. Kim GB, et al. 2022. Sci Transl Med. 14:eabo6135. PubMed
  9. Lao L, et al. 2023. Cancer Immunol Res. 11:320. PubMed
  10. Li N, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:1986. PubMed
  11. Scala S, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:3068. PubMed
  12. Marquardt I, et al. 2022. Front Microbiol. 12:752549. PubMed
  13. Tan AT, et al. 2021. J Clin Invest. 131:. PubMed
  14. Swadling L, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 30:687. PubMed
  15. Rodriguez-García A, et al. 2020. Mol Ther. 28:548. PubMed
  16. Jing Li et al. 2018. Immunity. 48(4):773-786 . PubMed
  17. Dyring-Andersen B, et al. 2020. Nat Commun. 4.338194444. PubMed
  18. Huang B, et al. 2020. Cell. 179(5):1160-1176.e24.. PubMed
  19. Cao W, et al. 2017. Immunity. 47:1182. PubMed
  20. Richert-Spuhler LE, et al. 2021. Cell Reports Medicine. 2(6):100322. PubMed
  21. Kalimuddin S, et al. 2021. Med. 2(6):682-688.e4. PubMed
  22. Watanabe K, et al. 2018. JCI Insight. 3. PubMed
  23. Gullà A, et al. 2021. Cancer Discov. . PubMed
  24. Kuo HH, et al. 2018. Immunity. 48:1183. PubMed
  25. Guo J, et al. 2019. Cancer Immunol Res. 1.349305556. PubMed
  26. Mengrelis K, et al. 2021. Pediatr Transplant. 25:e13930. PubMed
  27. Brown CC, et al. 2020. Cell. 179(4):846-863.e24.. PubMed
  28. Martín–Gayo E, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 30:984. PubMed
  29. Zimmerman KA, et al. 2019. J Am Soc Nephrol. 30:767. PubMed
  30. Lim JME, et al. 2022. Cell Rep Med. 3:100793. PubMed
  31. Johnson JK, et al. 2022. Methods Mol Biol. 2470:641. PubMed
  32. Khoo NKH, et al. 2022. Med (N Y). 3:104. PubMed
  33. Kim MY, et al. 2018. Cell. 173:1439. PubMed
  34. Xu C, et al. 2020. Methods Mol Biol. 2108:159. PubMed
  35. Day C, et al. 2017. J Immunol. 10.4049/jimmunol.1700558. PubMed
  36. Leng T, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 28:3077. PubMed
  37. Shuwa HA, et al. 2021. Med. 2(6):720-735.e4. PubMed
  38. Gullà A, et al. 2021. Cancer Discov. 2:468. PubMed
  39. Panigrahi S, et al. 2020. Eur J Immunol. 50:2055. PubMed
  40. Giudice V, et al. 2017. Cytometry A. 10.1002/cyto.a.23162. PubMed
  41. Baxter AE, et al. 2017. Nat Protoc. 12:2029. PubMed
  42. Wang J, et al. 2020. Cell. 183(7):1867-1883.e26. PubMed
  43. Zimmerman KA, et al. 2019. Physiol Rep. 7:e13951. PubMed
RRID
AB_11126166 (BioLegend Cat. No. 317321)
AB_11126166 (BioLegend Cat. No. 317322)

Antigen Details

Structure
Ig superfamily, the subunits CD3γ, CD3δ, CD3ζ (CD247) and TCR (α/β or γ/δ) form the CD3/TCR complex, 20 kD
Distribution

Mature T and NK T cells, thymocyte differentiation

Function
Antigen recognition, signal transduction, T cell activation
Ligand/Receptor
Peptide antigen bound to MHC
Cell Type
NKT cells, T cells, Thymocytes, Tregs
Biology Area
Immunology
Molecular Family
CD Molecules
Antigen References
  1. Barclay N, et al. 1993. The Leucocyte FactsBook. Academic Press. San Diego.
  2. Beverly P, et al. 1981. Eur. J. Immunol. 11:329.
  3. Lanier L, et al. 1986. J. Immunol. 137:2501.
Gene ID
916 View all products for this Gene ID
UniProt
View information about CD3 on UniProt.org
Go To Top Version: 2    Revision Date: 06/12/2013

8999 BioLegend Way, San Diego, CA 92121 www.biolegend.com
Toll-Free Phone: 1-877-Bio-Legend (246-5343) Phone: (858) 768-5800 Fax: (877) 455-9587

This data display is provided for general comparisons between formats.
Your actual data may vary due to variations in samples, target cells, instruments and their settings, staining conditions, and other factors.
If you need assistance with selecting the best format contact our expert technical support team.

Login/Register
Forgot your password? Reset Password
Request an Account