APC anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells Antibody

Pricing & Availability
Clone
TER-119 (See other available formats)
Regulatory Status
RUO
Other Names
Ly-76
Isotype
Rat IgG2b, κ
TER-119_APC_122107
C57BL/6 bone marrow cells stained with TER-119 APC and anti-mouse CD45 FITC
  • TER-119_APC_122107
    C57BL/6 bone marrow cells stained with TER-119 APC and anti-mouse CD45 FITC
Compare all formats See APC spectral data
Cat # Size Price Quantity Check Availability
116211 25 µg $44.00
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
116212 100 µg $138.00
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
Description

The TER-119 antigen is a 52 kD glycophorin A-associated protein, also known as Ly-76. TER-119 is an erythroid-specific antigen expressed on early proerythroblasts to mature erythrocytes, but not on erythroid colony-forming cells (BFU-E, blast-forming unit erythroid, or CFU-E, colony-forming unit erythroid).

Technical data sheet

Product Details

Verified Reactivity
Mouse
Antibody Type
Monoclonal
Host Species
Rat
Immunogen
Day-14 fetal liver cells from a C57BL/6 mouse
Formulation
Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide.
Preparation
The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography, and conjugated with APC under optimal conditions.
Concentration
0.2 mg/ml
Storage & Handling
The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C, and protected from prolonged exposure to light. Do not freeze.
Application

FC - Quality tested

Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤1.0 µg per million cells in 100 µl volume. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

Excitation Laser
Red Laser (633 nm)
Application Notes

The TER-119 antibody is useful for distinguishing erythrocytes and cells in the erythroid lineage. Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: immunoprecipitation1, Western blotting1, complement-mediated cytotoxicity3, and immunohistochemical staining of acetone-fixed frozen sections and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. Ultra-LEAF™ purified antibody (Endotoxin < 0.01 EU/µg, Azide-Free, 0.2 µm filtered) is recommended for functional assays (Cat. No. 116253-116258).

Application References

(PubMed link indicates BioLegend citation)
  1. Kina T, et al. 2000. Br. J. Haematol. 109:280. (IP, WB)
  2. Vannucchi AM, et al. 2000. Blood 95:2559.
  3. Maraskovsky E, et al. 1996. J. Exp. Med. 184:1953. (CMCD)
  4. Grisendi S, et al. 2005. Nature 437:147. (FC)
  5. Bourdeau A, et al. 2007. Blood 109:4220.
  6. Chappaz S, et al. 2007. Blood 110:3862. (FC)
  7. Heuser M, et al. 2007. Blood 110:1639. (FC)
  8. Gough SM, et al. 2014. Cancer Discov. 4:564. PubMed
Product Citations
  1. Koury D, et al. 2017. Int J Parasitol. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.05.009. PubMed
  2. Wang L, et al. 2018. Bone Res. 6:22. PubMed
  3. Ray S, et al. 2022. Elife. 11:. PubMed
  4. Awida Z, et al. 2022. Int J Mol Sci. 23:. PubMed
  5. Gómez-Salinero JM, et al. 2022. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 1:882. PubMed
  6. Peng YJ, et al. 2023. Development. 150:. PubMed
  7. Kawai H, et al. 2023. JBMR Plus. 7:e10722. PubMed
  8. Kalgudde Gopal S, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:3020. PubMed
  9. Sucre JM, et al. 2023. JCI Insight. . PubMed
  10. Menolfi D, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:3618. PubMed
  11. Yang D, et al. 2022. Cell. 185:1905. PubMed
  12. Aimaitijiang A, et al. 2022. Genes Cells. 27:25. PubMed
  13. Kozuki S, et al. 2022. Genes Cells. 27:192. PubMed
  14. Yousefi M, et al. 2022. Cancer Res. 82:1589. PubMed
  15. Tátrai P, et al. 2022. EMBO J. 41:e108739. PubMed
  16. Cattaneo P, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:7444. PubMed
  17. Wu Q, et al. 2023. Cell Rep. 42:112057. PubMed
  18. Leick MB, et al. 2022. Cancer Cell. 40:494. PubMed
  19. DeSouza-Vieira T, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 33:108317. PubMed
  20. Viny AD, et al. 2019. Cell Stem Cell. 25:682. PubMed
  21. Ray S, et al. 2020. J Biol Chem. 295:7113. PubMed
  22. Mourao L, et al. 2019. Sci Rep. 0.991666667. PubMed
  23. Tanimura N et al. 2018. Developmental cell. 46(5):581-594 . PubMed
  24. Symeonidou V, et al. 2021. Cell Rep. 37:109900. PubMed
  25. Chappaz S, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 36(3):109430. PubMed
  26. Yu VWC et al. 2016. Cell. 167(5):1310-1322 . PubMed
  27. Engelbrecht E, et al. 2020. eLife. 9:e52690.. PubMed
  28. Lutzmann M, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 28:2851. PubMed
  29. Li C, et al. 2021. Mol Ther. 29:822. PubMed
  30. Yanagida K, et al. 2020. Dev Cell. 779:52. PubMed
  31. Larouche JA, et al. 2021. eLife. 0.416666666666667. PubMed
  32. Liu P, et al. 2020. Genome Res. 30:1655. PubMed
  33. Bilodeau M, et al. 2009. PLoS One. 4:e7500. PubMed
  34. Dey A et al. 2019. The EMBO journal. 38(7) pii: e100293. PubMed
  35. Nishina T, et al. 2021. Nat Commun. 12:2281. PubMed
  36. Yeo S, et al. 2016. Cancer Res . 76: 3397 - 3410. PubMed
  37. Liu J, et al. 2012. PLoS One. 7:e44044. PubMed
  38. Kunimoto H, et al. 2018. Cancer Cell. 33:44. PubMed
  39. Parada-Kusz M, et al. 2018. Dis Model Mech. 11:. PubMed
  40. Stivala S, et al. 2019. J Clin Invest. 130:1596. PubMed
  41. Samarchith P Kurup et al. 2019. Cell host & microbe. 25(4):565-577 . PubMed
  42. Riffelmacher T et al. 2017. Immunity. 47(3):466-480 . PubMed
  43. Hillel–Karniel C, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 30(3):807-819.e4.. PubMed
  44. Liu S, et al. 2021. Mol Ther. 29:1918. PubMed
  45. Lafkas D, et al. 2013. J Cell Biol. 203:47. PubMed
  46. Guihard S, et al. 2010. Blood. 115:3686. PubMed
  47. Yu VWC, et al. 2017. Cell. 168:944. PubMed
  48. Chen X et al. 2017. Cell stem cell. 21(6):747-760 . PubMed
  49. Pal B, et al. 2017. Nat Commun.. 10.1038/s41467-017-01560-x. PubMed
  50. Haase C, et al. 2022. Nat Methods. 19:1622. PubMed
  51. Negretti NM, et al. 2021. Development. 148:. PubMed
  52. Shcherbina A, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 32:107964. PubMed
  53. Sá da Bandeira D, et al. 2022. Cell Rep. 40:111114. PubMed
  54. Saleiro D, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:1750. PubMed
  55. Pezoldt J, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:7227. PubMed
  56. Nayak RR, et al. 2021. Cell Host Microbe. 29(3):362-377.e11. PubMed
  57. Crowe JL, et al. 2020. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 22953:117. PubMed
  58. Perez E, et al. 2020. J Immunol. 205:2489. PubMed
  59. Dagher T, et al. 2021. J Exp Med. 218:. PubMed
  60. Nosho S, et al. 2020. Int J Mol Sci. 21:00. PubMed
  61. Kruta M, et al. 2021. Cell Stem Cell. :. PubMed
  62. Liu Z, et al. 2020. Cell. 178(6):1509-1525.e19.. PubMed
  63. Shin JJ, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 32:108093. PubMed
  64. Goldstein JM et al. 2019. Cell reports. 27(4):1254-1264 . PubMed
  65. Li G, et al. 2020. J Clin Invest. 130:1233. PubMed
  66. Long JT, et al. 2022. Elife. 11:. PubMed
  67. Wang H, et al. 2019. J Clin Invest. 129:598. PubMed
  68. Hou Y, et al. 2021. Sci Transl Med. 13:. PubMed
  69. Chen R, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(7):108751. PubMed
  70. Nahrendorf W, et al. 2021. eLife. 10:00. PubMed
  71. Song J, et al. 2014. Exp Cell Res. 327:123. PubMed
  72. Maroni G, et al. 2019. Int J Mol Sci. 20. PubMed
  73. Carmody C et al. 2019. Endocrinology. 160(5):1205-1222 . PubMed
  74. Fu NY, et al. 2018. Dev Cell. 47:629. PubMed
  75. Siddique SM, et al. 2019. Sci Rep. 9:13977. PubMed
  76. Yeo SK, et al. 2020. eLife. 9:e58810.. PubMed
  77. Omatsu Y, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:2654. PubMed
  78. Liu W, et al. 2022. J Clin Invest. 132: . PubMed
  79. Ma L, et al. 2022. Sci Adv. 8:eabm3470. PubMed
  80. Chen C, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 2136:30. PubMed
  81. Maeda K, et al. 2021. Pathogens. 10:. PubMed
  82. Magee JA, et al. 2021. Stem Cell Reports. 16:20. PubMed
  83. Rai S, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:5346. PubMed
  84. Cambridge E, et al. 2017. Exp Hematol. 45:64-68.e5. PubMed
  85. Markworth JF, et al. 2020. JCI Insight. 5:00. PubMed
  86. Wang H, et al. 2020. JCI Insight. 5:00. PubMed
  87. Woods B, et al. 2019. Clin Cancer Res. 25:5901. PubMed
  88. Hidalgo San Jose L, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 30:69. PubMed
  89. Pal B, et al. 2021. Breast Cancer Res. 23:69. PubMed
  90. Maller O, et al. 2020. Nat Mater. 20:548. PubMed
  91. Khoriaty R, et al. 2014. Mol Cell Biol. 34:3721. PubMed
  92. Koyama M et al. 2019. Immunity. 51(5):885-898 . PubMed
  93. Awida Z, et al. 2021. Int J Mol Sci. 23:. PubMed
  94. Yin Y, et al. 2016. J Biol Chem. 291: 6923 - 6935. PubMed
  95. Rowe R, et al. 2016. J Exp Med. 213: 1497 - 1512. PubMed
  96. Werner MT, et al. 2020. J Biol Chem. 295:1898. PubMed
  97. Lam J, et al. 2018. Nat Commun. 9:2418. PubMed
  98. Schmidts A, et al. 2020. J Immunother Cancer. 8:. PubMed
  99. Murray CW, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:1090. PubMed
RRID
AB_313712 (BioLegend Cat. No. 116211)
AB_313712 (BioLegend Cat. No. 116212)

Antigen Details

Structure
Associated with glycophorin A, 52 kD
Distribution

Early proerythroblast to mature erythrocyte, but not BFU-E and CFU-E

Cell Type
Erythrocytes
Biology Area
Immunology
Antigen References

1. Kina T, et al. 2000. Br. J. Haematol. 109:280.
2. Ikuta K, et al. 1990. Cell 62:863.
3. Osawa M, et al. 1996. Weir's Handbook of Experimental Immunology. Vol. 2 pp. 66.1-66.5.

Gene ID
104231 View all products for this Gene ID
UniProt
View information about TER-119 on UniProt.org

Other Formats

View All TER-119 Reagents Request Custom Conjugation
Description Clone Applications
APC anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Biotin anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
FITC anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PE anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PE/Cyanine5 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Purified anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC,IHC-F,IHC-P,IP,WB
Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Alexa Fluor® 647 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Alexa Fluor® 700 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
APC/Cyanine7 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PerCP anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 421™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Pacific Blue™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 650™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 510™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 605™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Purified anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells (Maxpar® Ready) TER-119 FC,CyTOF®
PE/Dazzle™ 594 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 785™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
TotalSeq™-A0122 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 PG
APC/Fire™ 750 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
TotalSeq™-B0122 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 PG
TotalSeq™-C0122 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 PG
Ultra-LEAF™ Purified anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC,IHC-F,IHC-P,IP,WB,CMCD
Spark Blue™ 550 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
APC/Fire™ 810 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Spark NIR™ 685 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells Antibody TER-119 FC
Brilliant Violet 711™ anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells TER-119 FC
Spark Red™ 718 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells (Flexi-Fluor™) TER-119 FC
Spark Blue™ 574 anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells (Flexi-Fluor™) TER-119 FC
Go To Top Version: 2    Revision Date: 12/04/2013

8999 BioLegend Way, San Diego, CA 92121 www.biolegend.com
Toll-Free Phone: 1-877-Bio-Legend (246-5343) Phone: (858) 768-5800 Fax: (877) 455-9587

This data display is provided for general comparisons between formats.
Your actual data may vary due to variations in samples, target cells, instruments and their settings, staining conditions, and other factors.
If you need assistance with selecting the best format contact our expert technical support team.

Login/Register
Forgot your password? Reset Password
Request an Account